Фото: Михаил Метцель / ТАСС
Nothing about this system makes sense, which is why I think we should build a new one. In the meantime, though, we should also fix the old one. But that’s hard, for two reasons. First, many people are invested in things working exactly the way they do now, so every stupid idea has a constituency behind it. Second, our current administration seems to believe in policy by bloodletting: if something isn’t working, just slice it open at random. Thanks to these haphazard cuts and cancellations, we now have a system that is both dysfunctional and anemic.
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法下载
Пьяный турист нанес тяжелую травму участвовавшей в Олимпиаде сноубордистке20:38
The key here is that you don’t have to call resume immediately. Just like how you can store a closure to compute some result later, you can wrap resume in a closure and wait to call it some other time. The state of the function that triggered the effect will be stored with the closure just like any other data. You can see this in action in the Effekt async example.
Have you ever been in a situation where you had all your data stored at one place and that one secure place got compromised? Wouldn't it be great if there was a way to prevent your data from leaking out even when the security of your storage systems is compromised?