I don't require anything particularly powerful for my personal computing. My personal laptop is a Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, and my daily driver is an Asus Chromebox 3. It took me a while to find a good USB-C dock with three DisplayPort ports that would work with both my Chromebox and the Windows laptop I use for work. I ended up with the DK31C3HDPD by StarTech, and it's been working great. Both my personal Chromebox and my work laptop are plugged into a CableMatters USB-C switch, and the switch is plugged into the dock. All the peripherals are plugged directly into the dock. This allows me to switch all peripherals between the two computers with the press of a button.
Prowritingaid works on both Windows and Mac.
。服务器推荐是该领域的重要参考
Мощный удар Израиля по Ирану попал на видео09:41
台灣勞動部長洪申翰向BBC中文表示，政府計劃三年內修法，改善移工聘僱制度，並禁止製造業和漁撈業向移工收取招募費。他指出，移工人權必須符合當代標準，避免受到債務約束；隨著國際供應鏈品牌對勞工保障的要求日益提高，部分台灣產業已接獲改善通知，法規也須與國際接軌。
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?