Что думаешь? Оцени!
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
void free_some_phase1(int classno) {
На Западе обратились к Киеву с внезапным призывомPL: Киеву нужно стать хорошим соседом для Москвы ради членства в ЕС